Re: libtool bites us again (aka Libtool's Revenge, part II)

[Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>]

On Mon, Dec 13, 1999 at 02:10:51AM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> It's section 4.2 of policy.  The last couple of paragraphs are not at
> all clear on this point.  While they say that the .la files should go
> in the -dev package, they also seem to encourage putting them in the
> runtime package instead.
> 
> Maybe this one needs to go to -policy to thrash out.

By all means. We don't need anymore packages breaking because of the lack
of forceful wording to have these in the -dev package if they are used at
all.

Thanks

-- 
 -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`     bcollins@debian.org  -  collinbm@djj.state.va.us  -  bmc@visi.net    '
 `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org