Re: Debian on a 386? Unlikely. (was: ramblings about oldhardware, gzip
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Debian on a 386? Unlikely. (was: ramblings about oldhardware, gzip, bz2, and pentium opts)
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Debian on a 386? Unlikely. (was: ramblings about oldhardware, gzip, bz2, and pentium opts)
- From: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 16:51:56 -0800
- In-Reply-To: <14413.37615.413001.462503@bolero>
- References: <19991207134422.A12721@balance.wiw.org><Pine.LNX.3.96.991207151524.388c-100000@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca><14413.37615.413001.462503@bolero>
At 00:09 +0100 1999-12-08, Matthias Klose wrote:
>one interesting alternative would be to use fat binaries. This worked
>very well for Openstep 4.x (by NeXT). The modifications to binutils
>and gcc are available from Apple, but someone would need to integrate
>them upstream ... I didn't look how much of this is already used in
>the Darwin project.
This won't really work, since we don't have the "app wrapper" stuff.
In Openstep, the GUI apps live in a directory called foo.app, "fat"
binaries work by putting more than one "real" binary in there.
--
Joel Klecker (aka Espy) Debian GNU/Linux Developer
<URL:mailto:jk@espy.org> <URL:mailto:espy@debian.org>
<URL:http://web.espy.org/> <URL:http://www.debian.org/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org