Re: Package Pool Proposal

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Package Pool Proposal
From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 06:01:14 -0500
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.991208181247.5211B-100000@wakko.deltatee.com>; from Jason Gunthorpe on Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 06:15:46PM -0700
Mail-Followup-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
References: <19991208192816.A30225@justice.loyola.edu> <Pine.LNX.3.96.991208181247.5211B-100000@wakko.deltatee.com>

On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 06:15:46PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Hum? If you have the ability to run a mirror of any sort then you have the
> ability to run APT properly - just NFS mount the space you were going to
> use for a mirror under /var/cache/apt/archives.

Providing a public read-only NFS server is usually a bit different than
providing a public read-write NFS server, even internally.

-- 
Mike Stone


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Package Pool Proposal
  - From: Filip Van Raemdonck <filipvr@xs4all.be>

References:
- Re: Package Pool Proposal
  - From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>
- Re: Package Pool Proposal
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ualberta.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL
Next by Date: Re: Dangerous precedent being set - possible serious violation of the GPL
Prev by thread: Re: Package Pool Proposal
Next by thread: Re: Package Pool Proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread